ios - Missing return in a function - swift error in Model -

-

so have self generated pie chart on storyboard various labels, sliders, buttons of age, currentasset, income, etc. i'm building model struct , keep getting errors several methods have "missing return in function expected return 'double'" though can see have returns currentassetfactor, savingsfactor, bondfactor, tolerancefactor, outlookfactor. doing wrong?

public struct allocationmodel {   let maxage = 95.0   let currentage: double    let mincurrentasset = 100000.0   let maxcurrentasset = 500000.0   let currentasset: double    let minsavings = 5000.0   let maxsavings = 20000.0   let currentsavings: double    let maxincomerequired = 0.04   let minincomerequired = 0.01   let currentincomerequired: double    let tolerance: string    let outlook: string    // mark: - methods    public var currentassetfactor: double {     if currentasset > maxcurrentasset {       return 5.0     } else if currentasset >= mincurrentasset {       return double(currentasset / mincurrentasset)     }   }    public var savingsfactor: double {     if currentsavings >= maxsavings {       return 4.0     } else if currentsavings >= minsavings {       return double(currentsavings / minsavings)     }   }    public var bondfactor: double {     if currentincomerequired >= maxincomerequired {       return 0.2     } else if currentincomerequired >= minincomerequired {       return (0.05 * double(currentincomerequired / minincomerequired) )     }   }    public var tolerancefactor: double {     switch tolerance {       case "conservative": return 0.0       case "balanced": return 3.0       case "aggressive": return 6.0     default: 0.0     }   }    public var outlookfactor: double {     switch outlook {       case "poor": return 0.0       case "moderate": return 7.0       case "strong": return 10.0     default: return 0.0     }   }     public var stock: double {     return maxage - currentage + currentassetfactor + savingsfactor + tolerancefactor + outlookfactor   }    public var nonstock: double { return 100.0 - stock }    public var bondpercentage: double { return 0.35 + bondfactor }    public var bond: double { return nonstock * bondpercentage }    public var cash: double { return nonstock - bond }    // mark: - init    public init(currentage: double, currentasset: double, currentsavings: double, currentincomerequired: double, tolerance: string, outlook: string) {     assert(currentage > 0)      self.currentage = currentage     self.currentasset = currentasset     self.currentsavings = currentsavings     self.currentincomerequired = currentincomerequired     self.tolerance = tolerance     self.outlook = outlook   }  }

you not covering every case. consider 1 of methods:

  public var currentassetfactor: double {     if currentasset > maxcurrentasset {       return 5.0     } else if currentasset >= mincurrentasset {       return double(currentasset / mincurrentasset)     }   }

fine. if first if fails (e.g. currentasset not greater maxcurrentasset) , second if fails (e.g. currentasset not greater or equal mincurrentasset)? don't return anything!

so there's hole in logic. , compiler smart - smarter are! so smart spots hole in logic, , stops in tracks. need rewrite methods in such way prove compiler every possibility covered, i.e. always return value, no matter what.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

java - Custom OutputStreamAppender not run: LOGBACK: No context given for <MYAPPENDER> -

-
i wish write custom appender on basis of outputstreamappender . wrote following class package tests; import java.io.ioexception; import java.io.outputstream; import ch.qos.logback.core.outputstreamappender; public class myappender<e> extends outputstreamappender<e> { public myappender() { system.out.println("myappender created"); setoutputstream(new outputstream() { @override public void write(int b) throws ioexception { throw new unsupportedoperationexception(); } }); } } then wrote following runner: package tests; import org.slf4j.loggerfactory; import ch.qos.logback.classic.logger; public class runner { private static final logger log = (logger) loggerfactory.getlogger(runner.class); public static void main(string[] args) { //log.addappender(new myappender<iloggingevent>()); log.info("hello world"); } } finall...
Read more

java - UML - How would you draw a try catch in a sequence diagram? -

-
Image
is there standard way of drawing try catch sequence diagrams? i've made attempt based on this feel end result doesn't feel right. code diagram based around: public static void save () { try { filehandle filehandle = gdx.files.external(file); filehandle.writestring(boolean.tostring(constantshandler.soundenabled)+"\n", false); (int = 0; < 5; i++) { filehandle.writestring(integer.tostring(constantshandler.highscores[i])+"\n", true); } } catch (throwable e) { } } my attempt note: know still need add loop. that's ok. fragments meant show conditional control flow in sequence diagram. superstructures puts limitations on use of fragments (see pp. 467 of ss2.1.1). should use critical region try part above. , option catch . however, keep telling can take quite freedom in using uml. it's language , such changes in life time. long reader ge...
Read more

c++ - No viable overloaded operator for references a map -

-
i trying use map can make tag names reference number. when try , use it, in code error (6 in total every time reference map): src/main.cpp:25:45: error: no viable overloaded operator[] type 'std::map<std::string, std::string>' const char* idcs = node.child_value(tagmap[3]); this code: #include "pugi/pugixml.hpp" #include <iostream> #include <string> #include <map> int main() { pugi::xml_document doca, docb; std::map<std::string, pugi::xml_node> mapa, mapb; std::map<std::string, std::string> tagmap {{"1", "data"}, {"2", "entry"}, {"3", "id"}, {"4", "content"}}; if (!doca.load_file("a.xml") || !docb.load_file("b.xml")) { std::cout << "can't find input files"; return 1; } (auto& node: doca.child(tagmap[1]).children(tagmap[2])) { co...
Read more