linux - Git push to master repo then send the dist folder to a specific path(/www/site/v0.0.1)? -

-

so goal push project core repo, development files live, backup purposes.

then want send dist folder directory www/site.com/v0.0.1, demonstration purposes, no development files needed, cause bloat because have multiple directories.

so have right .gitignore ignores pretty dist.

i ran git rm -r --cache , pushing dist, pitfall cant core repo, in case local environment destroyed, have compiled code, , not reverse engineering that.

#!/bin/sh currentversion=git describe --abbrev=0 mkdir /var/www/example.com/public_html/projects/$currentversion git --work-tree=/var/www/example.com/public_html/projects/$currentversion --git-dir=/var/repo/cool.git checkout -f

i can think of 2 situations

  1. two remote repos (core.git, demos.git), git add remote <ssh-repo/core.git & demos.git>, pitfall .gitignore how supposed specify repo uses ignores? 2 repos kind of sucks.

  2. inside bash script write enables me ignore files, add worktree, or possibly use linux command take dist , put desired version post-receive event?

a third possibly use branches, still git novice , not sure can do.

edit: 2 repos stupid if pushing dist folder, think in bash script need somehow take dist folder , use command copy desired path.

if dist dir contains generated artifacts , can re-created rest of core files i'd suggest 2 repos:

  • dist generated artifacts
  • core rest plus symlink dist repo (added git or not, each has advantages , disadvantages, you)

something along line (they don't have side side, whatever's convenient you):

$~/git> ls -la * core: total 36 drwxrwxr-x 3 user @  4096 apr 22 22:22 . drwxrwxr-x 4 user @  4096 apr 22 22:22 .. -rw-rw-r-- 1 user @ 22811 apr 22 22:22 blah lrwxrwxrwx 1 user @     7 apr 22 22:22 dist -> ../dist drwxrwxr-x 8 user @  4096 apr 22 22:23 .git  dist: total 16 drwxrwxr-x 3 user @ 4096 apr 22 22:23 . drwxrwxr-x 4 user @ 4096 apr 22 22:22 .. -rw-rw-r-- 1 user @   84 apr 22 22:24 blah_dist drwxrwxr-x 8 user @ 4096 apr 22 22:24 .git

no need .gitignore files. pushes core dir go source code backup repo, pushes dist dir (even under symlink inside core) go deployment repo(s). git smart enough to not mix 2 repos:

$~/git/core> git status on branch master nothing commit, working directory clean $~/git/core> cd dist/ $~/git/core/dist> git status on branch master changes not staged commit:   (use "git add <file>..." update committed)   (use "git checkout -- <file>..." discard changes in working directory)          modified:   blah_dist  no changes added commit (use "git add" and/or "git commit -a") $~/git/core/dist>

even if have files should shared both repos can consider them 'generated': have them in core repo , 'generate' them plain copy dist symlink/repo needed.

you can automate generation/refresh of dist artifacts using git push hook in core repo.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

java - Custom OutputStreamAppender not run: LOGBACK: No context given for <MYAPPENDER> -

-
i wish write custom appender on basis of outputstreamappender . wrote following class package tests; import java.io.ioexception; import java.io.outputstream; import ch.qos.logback.core.outputstreamappender; public class myappender<e> extends outputstreamappender<e> { public myappender() { system.out.println("myappender created"); setoutputstream(new outputstream() { @override public void write(int b) throws ioexception { throw new unsupportedoperationexception(); } }); } } then wrote following runner: package tests; import org.slf4j.loggerfactory; import ch.qos.logback.classic.logger; public class runner { private static final logger log = (logger) loggerfactory.getlogger(runner.class); public static void main(string[] args) { //log.addappender(new myappender<iloggingevent>()); log.info("hello world"); } } finall...
Read more

java - UML - How would you draw a try catch in a sequence diagram? -

-
Image
is there standard way of drawing try catch sequence diagrams? i've made attempt based on this feel end result doesn't feel right. code diagram based around: public static void save () { try { filehandle filehandle = gdx.files.external(file); filehandle.writestring(boolean.tostring(constantshandler.soundenabled)+"\n", false); (int = 0; < 5; i++) { filehandle.writestring(integer.tostring(constantshandler.highscores[i])+"\n", true); } } catch (throwable e) { } } my attempt note: know still need add loop. that's ok. fragments meant show conditional control flow in sequence diagram. superstructures puts limitations on use of fragments (see pp. 467 of ss2.1.1). should use critical region try part above. , option catch . however, keep telling can take quite freedom in using uml. it's language , such changes in life time. long reader ge...
Read more

c++ - No viable overloaded operator for references a map -

-
i trying use map can make tag names reference number. when try , use it, in code error (6 in total every time reference map): src/main.cpp:25:45: error: no viable overloaded operator[] type 'std::map<std::string, std::string>' const char* idcs = node.child_value(tagmap[3]); this code: #include "pugi/pugixml.hpp" #include <iostream> #include <string> #include <map> int main() { pugi::xml_document doca, docb; std::map<std::string, pugi::xml_node> mapa, mapb; std::map<std::string, std::string> tagmap {{"1", "data"}, {"2", "entry"}, {"3", "id"}, {"4", "content"}}; if (!doca.load_file("a.xml") || !docb.load_file("b.xml")) { std::cout << "can't find input files"; return 1; } (auto& node: doca.child(tagmap[1]).children(tagmap[2])) { co...
Read more