c# - Is there a storage library that abstracts away Azure, S3 and others? -

-

i developing application supports running in cloud, either amazon or azure. once of components need abstraction around storage apis (blobs , queues). can write abstraction layer, still end huge set of dependencies (all azure , amazon libraries). want component provides pure http access, don't need take external dependencies. such beast exist?

edit

what have done far build interface abstracts away basic operation on blobs. i've ended similar following:

public interface iblobservice {   task<stream> downloadblob(string container, string blob);   ienumerable<string> listblobs(string container);   void putblob(string container, string blob, stream data); }

i understand different services have different behaviors, both support basic set of crud operations. i'm finding keep adding additional methods change calling behavior. example, addition 

void putblob(string container, string blob, stream data);

i end needing

void putblob(string container, string blob, byte[] data);

after building nth method in both services, realized must have done already. given both wrappers around respective http interfaces, looking library provides abstraction around these operations. difference between sending byte array , stream 0 far http concerned, each service requires it's own flavor (headers, encoding, hmac, etc).

what want similar odbc provides databases - api provides common set of functionality, while acknowledging there differences in backing platform. hope narrows request down enough.

thanks, erick

the library twentytwenty.storage abstraction storage of blobs. defines interfaces , implemntations exist azure, amazon s3, google cloud storage, , local file system. more information on github of project : twentytwenty.storage

it available .net 4.5 , .net core (netstandard 1.3), , can installed via nuget.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

java - Custom OutputStreamAppender not run: LOGBACK: No context given for <MYAPPENDER> -

-
i wish write custom appender on basis of outputstreamappender . wrote following class package tests; import java.io.ioexception; import java.io.outputstream; import ch.qos.logback.core.outputstreamappender; public class myappender<e> extends outputstreamappender<e> { public myappender() { system.out.println("myappender created"); setoutputstream(new outputstream() { @override public void write(int b) throws ioexception { throw new unsupportedoperationexception(); } }); } } then wrote following runner: package tests; import org.slf4j.loggerfactory; import ch.qos.logback.classic.logger; public class runner { private static final logger log = (logger) loggerfactory.getlogger(runner.class); public static void main(string[] args) { //log.addappender(new myappender<iloggingevent>()); log.info("hello world"); } } finall...
Read more

java - UML - How would you draw a try catch in a sequence diagram? -

-
Image
is there standard way of drawing try catch sequence diagrams? i've made attempt based on this feel end result doesn't feel right. code diagram based around: public static void save () { try { filehandle filehandle = gdx.files.external(file); filehandle.writestring(boolean.tostring(constantshandler.soundenabled)+"\n", false); (int = 0; < 5; i++) { filehandle.writestring(integer.tostring(constantshandler.highscores[i])+"\n", true); } } catch (throwable e) { } } my attempt note: know still need add loop. that's ok. fragments meant show conditional control flow in sequence diagram. superstructures puts limitations on use of fragments (see pp. 467 of ss2.1.1). should use critical region try part above. , option catch . however, keep telling can take quite freedom in using uml. it's language , such changes in life time. long reader ge...
Read more

c++ - No viable overloaded operator for references a map -

-
i trying use map can make tag names reference number. when try , use it, in code error (6 in total every time reference map): src/main.cpp:25:45: error: no viable overloaded operator[] type 'std::map<std::string, std::string>' const char* idcs = node.child_value(tagmap[3]); this code: #include "pugi/pugixml.hpp" #include <iostream> #include <string> #include <map> int main() { pugi::xml_document doca, docb; std::map<std::string, pugi::xml_node> mapa, mapb; std::map<std::string, std::string> tagmap {{"1", "data"}, {"2", "entry"}, {"3", "id"}, {"4", "content"}}; if (!doca.load_file("a.xml") || !docb.load_file("b.xml")) { std::cout << "can't find input files"; return 1; } (auto& node: doca.child(tagmap[1]).children(tagmap[2])) { co...
Read more