python - Initializing a class that consist of many classes in such a way that one of the classes has different attributes -


here classes , relations:

http://i.imgur.com/hs5yrzz.png

code clarification:

class a(object):     def __init__(self):         self.atr = 1  class b(object):     def __init__(self):         self.atr = a()  class c(object):     def __init__(self):         self.atr = a()   class d(object):     def __init__(self):         self.atr1 = b()         self.atr2 = c()   test1 = d() 

now do if want initialize d in such way a's self.atr = 2, , change reflects classes (b , c) use a when initialize d

like imagine in pseudo code:

test2 = d(a.self.atr = 2) 

so initialize d in such manner a's self.atr = 2

if want b , c have different properties, required call d, way pass parameters initialization of b , c know do.

the parameter can instance of a, attributes care set before inistantiatin b , c:

class a(object):     def __init__(self, atr=1):         self.atr = atr  class b(object):     def __init__(self, config):         self.atr = config  class c(object):     def __init__(self, config):         self.atr = config  class d(object):     def __init__(self):         my_a = a(2)         self.atr1 = b(my_a)         self.atr2 = c(my_a)  test1 = d() 

update see comments above seem dislike approach duew impression you'd have lot of repetitive code everywhere - not case - if example, have lot of classes have "preconfigured" class a, passed lot of other classes, create bundle of classes pre-configured - you'd still pass on single parameter each instance create.

also, there are, want, mechanisms in python allow dynamically reconfiguring classes - using "variables" being 1 of them - probelm doing in naive way want, you'd ahve pretty unmaintainable mess.

for example, if use module-level (= global) variable "1" instead of hardcoding a, do:

current_atr_value = 1 class a(object):     def __init__(self):         self.atr = current_atr_value  class b(object):     def __init__(self):         self.atr = a()  class c(object):     def __init__(self):         self.atr = a()   class d(object):     def __init__(self, atr):         global current_atr_value         old = current_atr_value          current_atr_value = atr         self.atr1 = b()         self.atr2 = c()         current_atr_value = old   test1 = d(atr=2) 

this have thge exact effect intending, not simpler - whithout requiring of language's advanced introspection capabilities, , still lead unmaintainable mess. way passing parameters around contain custom values in scopes wanted, without side-effects, not in multi-threading or multi-processing running environment, , far more recomendable.

if want mess things around, create factory function produce new class "a" desired attributes, , inject in module global namespace new "a" class while instantiate others - "fancier" , maybe you'd like. write inside like:

def a_factory(atr=1):         class a(object):         def __init__(self, atr=1):             self.atr = atr     globals()["a"] =  # creates default "a" class a_factory(1) 

and call factory desired "atr" while instantiating "b" , "c" above. absolutely unmanageable, asking for. t


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

java - Custom OutputStreamAppender not run: LOGBACK: No context given for <MYAPPENDER> -

java - UML - How would you draw a try catch in a sequence diagram? -

c++ - No viable overloaded operator for references a map -