How to keep C# and Javascript Code in sync? -

-

i should think problem come anyone, i'm interested in ways of making best use of technology keep code-base dry , in sync.

i'm developing asp.net mvc5 web application. have several variables need communicating client side. "pagetype", need tracked on client side using google analytics. intent may multifarious, simple application same purpose, illustration.

i have c# class allows me specify various pagetypes , switch between them switch-casing, say:

public static class pagetypes {     public const string home = "home";     public const string aboutus = "aboutus";     public const string contactus = "contactus"; }

this useful when check dynamic values, like:

string pagetype = viewbag.pagetype; if(!string.isnullorwhitespace(pagetype)) {     switch(pagetype)     {         case pagetypes.home:             // here             break;         case pagetypes.aboutus:             // else here             break;         ...

... or when doing comparisons. hope point. so, in razor view, can output var pagetype = '@viewbag.pagetype'; in page in inline script, , present var pagetype = 'home'; or such case, in inline javascript of page. now, did c# code, want able switch-case page type inside javascript.

// part dynamic inline script of razor view var pagetype = 'home';  // part logic can reside in external script  // part illustration, worry naming , accessibility later // in separate script , included, , referenced, thereby providing intellisense within visual studio var pagetypes = {     home: 'home',     aboutus: 'aboutus' };  // should able this, in external script switch(pagetype){     case pagetypes.home:         alert('home!');         break;     case pagetypes.aboutus:         alert('not home');         break;     default:         alert('nothing');         break; }

it can seen if static class pagetypes of c# in sync var pagetypes in javascript, boon our developers, intellisense , predefined values, may avoid typos , incompatibilities of values.

what's best way achieve this, while gaining intellisense in both c# , javascript?

i prefer changes in c# affecting js rather reverse. switch statements need not converted, constant values have mentioned.

i think script in build process useful there tool/plugin/alternate way accomplish have mentioned?

if have understand problem is, can is:

  • set pagetype in variable inside html markup, using template engine (sorry, don't work .net, don't know how write it). in example, used data-* in body element

< body data-type="%some template engine syntax output page type%">

  • in js, retrieve data-type value (in example, used jquery)

    var type = $("body").data("type");

  • define functions, each 1 pagetype, inside key/object variable / object

    var pagetypefunctions = { home: function() {

    }, aboutus: function() {  }, xpto: function() {  }

    }

  • invoke function

    pagetypefunctionstype;

with approach, won't have deal pagetypes variable. need 1 function each pagetype. of course can check validate if pagetypefunctions[type] exists.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

java - Custom OutputStreamAppender not run: LOGBACK: No context given for <MYAPPENDER> -

-
i wish write custom appender on basis of outputstreamappender . wrote following class package tests; import java.io.ioexception; import java.io.outputstream; import ch.qos.logback.core.outputstreamappender; public class myappender<e> extends outputstreamappender<e> { public myappender() { system.out.println("myappender created"); setoutputstream(new outputstream() { @override public void write(int b) throws ioexception { throw new unsupportedoperationexception(); } }); } } then wrote following runner: package tests; import org.slf4j.loggerfactory; import ch.qos.logback.classic.logger; public class runner { private static final logger log = (logger) loggerfactory.getlogger(runner.class); public static void main(string[] args) { //log.addappender(new myappender<iloggingevent>()); log.info("hello world"); } } finall...
Read more

java - UML - How would you draw a try catch in a sequence diagram? -

-
Image
is there standard way of drawing try catch sequence diagrams? i've made attempt based on this feel end result doesn't feel right. code diagram based around: public static void save () { try { filehandle filehandle = gdx.files.external(file); filehandle.writestring(boolean.tostring(constantshandler.soundenabled)+"\n", false); (int = 0; < 5; i++) { filehandle.writestring(integer.tostring(constantshandler.highscores[i])+"\n", true); } } catch (throwable e) { } } my attempt note: know still need add loop. that's ok. fragments meant show conditional control flow in sequence diagram. superstructures puts limitations on use of fragments (see pp. 467 of ss2.1.1). should use critical region try part above. , option catch . however, keep telling can take quite freedom in using uml. it's language , such changes in life time. long reader ge...
Read more

c++ - No viable overloaded operator for references a map -

-
i trying use map can make tag names reference number. when try , use it, in code error (6 in total every time reference map): src/main.cpp:25:45: error: no viable overloaded operator[] type 'std::map<std::string, std::string>' const char* idcs = node.child_value(tagmap[3]); this code: #include "pugi/pugixml.hpp" #include <iostream> #include <string> #include <map> int main() { pugi::xml_document doca, docb; std::map<std::string, pugi::xml_node> mapa, mapb; std::map<std::string, std::string> tagmap {{"1", "data"}, {"2", "entry"}, {"3", "id"}, {"4", "content"}}; if (!doca.load_file("a.xml") || !docb.load_file("b.xml")) { std::cout << "can't find input files"; return 1; } (auto& node: doca.child(tagmap[1]).children(tagmap[2])) { co...
Read more