SQL query taking a long time depending on the option -

-

i'm working on stored proc , thing 1 of options take 5 minutes run, of others takes 5 seconds.

declare @rpttype varchar(75) set @rpttype = 'audits'      select clt.[cltnum] [client number] ,clt.[clteng] [engagement] ,clt.[cltname] [client name] , clt.[csplname] [assurance partner], clt.[cmglname], e.[ddeventdesc] [project type], budget.[cbudprojectdesc] [project description], due.[cdtargetamount] [budget], min(wip.[wdate]) [1st date], cast(sum(wip.[wrate]*wip.[whours]) decimal(34,2)) [billable wip], cast( sum(ar.[arprogress])as decimal(34,2)) [progress], cast((sum(wip.[wrate]*wip.[whours]) - sum(ar.[arprogress]))as decimal(34,2)) [net wip],  cast(sum(bucket.[cinvar])as decimal(34,2)) [ar balence], max(inv.[invdate]) [last invoicedate], due.[cddatedelivered] [project otd date]from [sab].[dbo].[wip] wip     join [sab].[dbo].clients clt       on wip.[wcltid] = clt.[id]     join [sab].[dbo].[cltdue] due       on due.[cdid] = wip.[wdue]     join [sab].[dbo].[ddevents] e       on due.[cdeventid] = e.[id]     join [sab].[dbo].[invoice] inv       on wip.[winvnum] = inv.[invnumber]     join [sab].[dbo].[acctsrec] ar       on inv.[invnumber] = ar.[arapplyto]     join [sab].[dbo].[clientbuckets] bucket       on clt.id = bucket.id     join [sab].[dbo].[cltbudget] budget        on clt.id = cbudcltid         (@rpttype = 'audit - payroll' , e.[ddeventdesc] = 'audit - payroll' , ar.[artype] = 1 , (clt.[cmaster]=1 or clt.[cinvindiveng] = 0) ) or           (@rpttype = 'audits' , (e.[id] =   '132' or e.[id] = '133' or e.[id] = '134' or e.[id] = '135' or e.[id] = '139' or e.[id] = '140' or e.[id] = '142' or e.[id] = '178')                                                         , ar.[artype] = 1 , (clt.[cmaster]=1 or clt.[cinvindiveng] = 0)                                                        ) or           (@rpttype = 'reviews & comps' , e.[ddeventdesc] in  ('audit - review', 'audit -comp/disc','audit - comp w/o disc') , ar.[artype] = 1 , (clt.[cmaster]=1 or clt.[cinvindiveng] = 0)) or           (@rpttype = 'assur tax returns' , e.[ddeventdesc] in ('5500','720-pcori','8955-ssa','campaign report','corporate (1120-pol)','lm-1','lm-2','lm-3','lm-4','lm-10','lm-30','non-profit (990)','non-profit (990 ez)','non-profit (990-n)','non-profit (990-t)','schedule c letters','section 104d letter')  , ar.[artype] = 1 , (clt.[cmaster]=1 or clt.[cinvindiveng] = 0) )      group           clt.[cltnum],          clt.[clteng],          clt.[cltname],          clt.[csplname],          e.[ddeventdesc],          budget.[cbudprojectdesc],          due.[cdtargetamount],          due.[cddatedelivered],          due.[cddatereceived],           clt.[cmglname]     having sum(bucket.[cinvar])>0

'audits' 1 taking long.

presuming issue when @rptype "audits", thing notice different in case query on column "[id]" table [sab].[dbo].[ddevents].

there number of things cause run slower. first thing check whether or not index has been created on column [id]. if no index, why taking long.

another possibility is returning lot more data, taking longer normal.

as side note, instead of excessive use of "or" in part:

and (e.[id] =   '132' or e.[id] = '133' or e.[id] = '134' or e.[id] = '135' or e.[id] = '139' or e.[id] = '140' or e.[id] = '142' or e.[id] = '178')

you use "in":

and e.[id] in ('132', '133',' 134', '135', '139', '140', '142', '178')

the difference shouldn't affect performance--but make code cleaner.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

c++ - No viable overloaded operator for references a map -

-
i trying use map can make tag names reference number. when try , use it, in code error (6 in total every time reference map): src/main.cpp:25:45: error: no viable overloaded operator[] type 'std::map<std::string, std::string>' const char* idcs = node.child_value(tagmap[3]); this code: #include "pugi/pugixml.hpp" #include <iostream> #include <string> #include <map> int main() { pugi::xml_document doca, docb; std::map<std::string, pugi::xml_node> mapa, mapb; std::map<std::string, std::string> tagmap {{"1", "data"}, {"2", "entry"}, {"3", "id"}, {"4", "content"}}; if (!doca.load_file("a.xml") || !docb.load_file("b.xml")) { std::cout << "can't find input files"; return 1; } (auto& node: doca.child(tagmap[1]).children(tagmap[2])) { co
Read more

java - Custom OutputStreamAppender not run: LOGBACK: No context given for <MYAPPENDER> -

-
i wish write custom appender on basis of outputstreamappender . wrote following class package tests; import java.io.ioexception; import java.io.outputstream; import ch.qos.logback.core.outputstreamappender; public class myappender<e> extends outputstreamappender<e> { public myappender() { system.out.println("myappender created"); setoutputstream(new outputstream() { @override public void write(int b) throws ioexception { throw new unsupportedoperationexception(); } }); } } then wrote following runner: package tests; import org.slf4j.loggerfactory; import ch.qos.logback.classic.logger; public class runner { private static final logger log = (logger) loggerfactory.getlogger(runner.class); public static void main(string[] args) { //log.addappender(new myappender<iloggingevent>()); log.info("hello world"); } } finall
Read more

java - Cannot secure connection using TLS -

-
i'm trying establish secure socket connection between java client applet (built jdk 1.7.0_75-b13) , vc++ server application. as test vehicle, used vc++ client/server sample found in msdn forums, modified use schannel , able establish socket using cipher suite tls_rsa_with_aes_128_cbc_sha. works of tls 1.0/1.1/1.2. when try opening socket java applet same server application, connection rejected server reporting following: tls 1.0 acceptsecuritycontext failed: 0x80090327 tls 1.1 acceptsecuritycontext failed: 0x80090331 tls 1.2 acceptsecuritycontext failed: 0x80090331 this java code used create socket: debugprint("setting secure connection"); sslsocketfactory sslsocketfactory = (sslsocketfactory) sslsocketfactory.getdefault(); sslsocket sslsocket = (sslsocket) sslsocketfactory.createsocket("127.0.0.1", socketnumber); debugprint("starting handshake"); sslsocket.settcpnodelay(true); sslsocket.setsolinger(false, 0); sslsocket.s
Read more